If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Yes, Witten and Kent released on June 23rd in the same series of cuts as Rockhill. As far as I know neither has gotten a sniff from any other CFL teams.
Oh don't get me wrong...I'm not saying he sucks...I'm saying the way they use him sucks...in the "I just paid $13 bucks and a 1/2 pack of smokes for this so it better be good" kind of way...
Now we can go ahead and show what stellar ways we can waste Calvin and Blanco's talents too!
I must point out that Hugh Charles has always given his best for the Esks. The fact that he may be misused is not his fault. Get well soon Hugh.
Yes, both Charles and Koch have been good additions , even if they were ex Riders. At his size maybe Charles should be our KR and backup RB. If he gets the rock 20 times a game he is bound to get worn out especially with our Oline at it's present abilities. He has been a pleasant surprise ever since he has been here. Nothing but respect for what he has done for us.
Yes, both Charles and Koch have been good additions , even if they were ex Riders. At his size maybe Charles should be our KR and backup RB. If he gets the rock 20 times a game he is bound to get worn out especially with our Oline at it's present abilities. He has been a pleasant surprise ever since he has been here. Nothing but respect for what he has done for us.
They have been Koch has become a very solid number 2 receiver behind Stamps and Charles could be lightning in the bottle but you are 100% right he is not a give him the ball and let him wear down the defence 20 times a game kind of back. Get him out on a screen or running a flat or wheel route and you have one dangerous receiver out of the backfield mixed in with a few runs. Both those guys are real quality starters even despite once being on the dark side of the moon.
Comment