Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2024 Edmonton Elks

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bone
    replied
    Originally posted by ben_the_eskimo View Post

    Probably. MBTs winning percentage has been awful this year but it hasn’t been historically. And he’s proven he can still play at a high level while providing good veteran leadership.

    Ford is a dynamic up and comer with a skillset unlike any other QB in the league and has won a lot of games for a really raw player who came out of the CIS.

    Doege has shown some potential last year but is still an unknown at this point.

    That’s a better QB room than we’ve had since the Reilly era IMO.
    Historically MBT's winning percentage hasn't been all that great other than the two years post-covid for Toronto where it turned out that the team got even better once he moved on. A career 27-33 CFL career doesn't exactly scream perpetual winner. Hasn't he only started something like 3 career playoff games as well. Not all his fault, but it kind of supports the notion that he's a great QB at keeping you in the game but not necessarily to win you the game.

    Leave a comment:


  • ben_the_eskimo
    replied
    Originally posted by Sectionq View Post

    What do you base the QB position as being solid? Do you feel that if the Elks came back with the same 3 QB's in the order they are in, they would win?
    Probably. MBTs winning percentage has been awful this year but it hasn’t been historically. And he’s proven he can still play at a high level while providing good veteran leadership.

    Ford is a dynamic up and comer with a skillset unlike any other QB in the league and has won a lot of games for a really raw player who came out of the CIS.

    Doege has shown some potential last year but is still an unknown at this point.

    That’s a better QB room than we’ve had since the Reilly era IMO.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied
    Originally posted by ben_the_eskimo View Post
    The thing is, there is talent on this roster..

    QB - Solid with depth
    RB - Excellent
    WR - Loads of talent there
    OL - Above average

    DL - Average, could use a boost there
    LB - Excellent
    DB - Decent, a few really good pieces

    K - Could be better
    P - Excellent
    KR - Very pedestrian, should be better.

    Across the board this team should be better than there record, they’re just missing something.

    And I don’t know if it’s easier to try and figure out what that missing ingredient is, or wipe the slate clean and start over…again…

    I can’t help but wonder if this could be a repeat of 2013 when we went 4-14 losing a lot of close games and then the same roster came back motivated and made a lot of noise in 2014, followed by 2015 where they were absolutely dominant.
    What do you base the QB position as being solid? Do you feel that if the Elks came back with the same 3 QB's in the order they are in, they would win?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied
    Originally posted by Looner View Post

    Do you know who said that? I would be interested to see that quote. As far as Mathis goes, he showed up last game and he looks like he could be a very good CFL player but we shall see.
    I think it was Dunk. He was on Gregor's show a few months back.

    Leave a comment:


  • ben_the_eskimo
    replied
    The thing is, there is talent on this roster..

    QB - Solid with depth
    RB - Excellent
    WR - Loads of talent there
    OL - Above average

    DL - Average, could use a boost there
    LB - Excellent
    DB - Decent, a few really good pieces

    K - Could be better
    P - Excellent
    KR - Very pedestrian, should be better.

    Across the board this team should be better than there record, they’re just missing something.

    And I don’t know if it’s easier to try and figure out what that missing ingredient is, or wipe the slate clean and start over…again…

    I can’t help but wonder if this could be a repeat of 2013 when we went 4-14 losing a lot of close games and then the same roster came back motivated and made a lot of noise in 2014, followed by 2015 where they were absolutely dominant.
    Last edited by ben_the_eskimo; 10-07-2024, 01:41 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Looner
    replied
    Originally posted by Sectionq View Post

    Maciocha hasn't been part of Edmonton in 14 yrs. Who cares. But regardless, doesn't mean it's a good move today.

    You are right, it's not the end of the world, they can overcome it but it's just another example why they are where they are. I heard awhile ago when it happened, other teams were offering 4th rounders, the Elks were the only ones offering a 1st. It's from one of the main CFL reporters so maybe it's not 100% but regardless, sounds like the Elks grossly overpaid for the player. All these small, not end of the world moves, do add up.
    Do you know who said that? I would be interested to see that quote. As far as Mathis goes, he showed up last game and he looks like he could be a very good CFL player but we shall see.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied
    Originally posted by cmbuk View Post

    Is this any worse than the stunt maciocha pulled? And we survived.. and to bat we got a usuable Canadian wr who has ncaa experience..

    it’s not the end of the world Q
    Maciocha hasn't been part of Edmonton in 14 yrs. Who cares. But regardless, doesn't mean it's a good move today.

    You are right, it's not the end of the world, they can overcome it but it's just another example why they are where they are. I heard awhile ago when it happened, other teams were offering 4th rounders, the Elks were the only ones offering a 1st. It's from one of the main CFL reporters so maybe it's not 100% but regardless, sounds like the Elks grossly overpaid for the player. All these small, not end of the world moves, do add up.

    Leave a comment:


  • cmbuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Sectionq View Post

    #2 overall good? I find that hard to believe but it's early so maybe in time.

    Was a receiver an area of the greatest need as a team when it happened and in the future that it was worth spending a #2 overall on? I don't think so but maybe it works out.
    Is this any worse than the stunt maciocha pulled? And we survived.. and to bat we got a usuable Canadian wr who has ncaa experience..

    it’s not the end of the world Q

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied
    Originally posted by cmbuk View Post

    Mathis is a good player..

    if we had took him first round next year I wouldn’t have complained…

    never look past a good player imho
    #2 overall good? I find that hard to believe but it's early so maybe in time.

    Was a receiver an area of the greatest need as a team when it happened and in the future that it was worth spending a #2 overall on? I don't think so but maybe it works out.

    Leave a comment:


  • cmbuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Maas_12 View Post
    I must be the only person that thinks its not MBT as the problem. Best chance to win is him. Problems are larger elsewhere. Is he able to single handedly win games? No.

    Agreed also that we only see one side of it and coaches could be right, maybe he just aint got it.

    This infatuation with Ford is madness.


    anyone else think Kai Gray has lost a step? Guy is too busy throwing out thumbs downs… seen him get beat by many steps multiple times.




    And lastly, season renewals/ pricing are out and past migrators from upper on grandfathered “honor pricing” will get a big shot to the system. I can see a lot of drop offs.
    Especially when you can pick up their “ deal” tix during the year and just go single game tix and since stadium is not even filling up….. no problem.

    im out
    Needs a complete reset…. All this is jonesy we need fresh ideas fresh approach

    at this point I wouldn’t be angry if we re upped Mbt for the right money…..

    but we will see

    Leave a comment:


  • cmbuk
    replied
    Originally posted by bombervu View Post
    Tough ending to a tough season. Killer fumble by Gittens Jr to turn the ball over late but no worse than the one earlier by Geno Lewis. 2024 Elks were one of the better teams not to make the playoffs imo.

    Not once this year did I think MBT was the problem although moot point at this stage. Even yesterday the secondary could not shut the Riders down.
    Bang on… Mbt was never an issue.. never

    Leave a comment:


  • Maas_12
    replied
    I must be the only person that thinks its not MBT as the problem. Best chance to win is him. Problems are larger elsewhere. Is he able to single handedly win games? No.

    Agreed also that we only see one side of it and coaches could be right, maybe he just aint got it.

    This infatuation with Ford is madness.


    anyone else think Kai Gray has lost a step? Guy is too busy throwing out thumbs downs… seen him get beat by many steps multiple times.




    And lastly, season renewals/ pricing are out and past migrators from upper on grandfathered “honor pricing” will get a big shot to the system. I can see a lot of drop offs.
    Especially when you can pick up their “ deal” tix during the year and just go single game tix and since stadium is not even filling up….. no problem.

    im out

    Leave a comment:


  • bombervu
    replied
    Tough ending to a tough season. Killer fumble by Gittens Jr to turn the ball over late but no worse than the one earlier by Geno Lewis. 2024 Elks were one of the better teams not to make the playoffs imo.

    Not once this year did I think MBT was the problem although moot point at this stage. Even yesterday the secondary could not shut the Riders down.

    Leave a comment:


  • cmbuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Moose Head View Post

    He looked good last night. Very tall, nice hands, smooth runner. He had the presence of mind to get open on a hot route on an all out blitz. Didn't like how he failed to get a first down on one catch when it was there for the taking, but he's young and looks like he has a ton of upside. Still... I would have kept the first round pick in the draft. And kudos on the use of "pissant." It's been a long time since I heard that word and it made me laugh.
    Imho he’s a keeper and there are a couple of recievers on our roster 88 for example I would like to see get so time

    Leave a comment:


  • cmbuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Sectionq View Post
    I don't think you give up a first rounder that looks like it could be #2 overall for Mathis. He might have some upside but it was another stupid decision made by this organization. There is a reason they lose. Hopefully the new Pres cleans house.
    Mathis is a good player..

    if we had took him first round next year I wouldn’t have complained…

    never look past a good player imho

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X