Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jim Barker

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Re: Jim Barker

    Originally posted by stamphater View Post
    You wouldn't like me:
    -3 QB system
    -12 man drop on defense
    -Fake punts/FG's galore
    -Cutting guys after a bad game.

    At least that's how I do it in Madden 2002.
    So you're saying that your defence wouldn't have blitzed 9 guys on 3rd and 10 with the game on the line? OK. You're hired.

    Which reminds me....why can SK blitz and rattle Burris to the point of throwing away the ball...while our D blitzes to the point of giving up 100 yard pass and run.
    I officially retract my vote for DDS as Prime Minister. He's clearly incompetent.

    Comment


      #32
      Re: Jim Barker

      Originally posted by Sgt. Nuke View Post
      So you're saying that your defence wouldn't have blitzed 9 guys on 3rd and 10 with the game on the line? OK. You're hired.

      Which reminds me....why can SK blitz and rattle Burris to the point of throwing away the ball...while our D blitzes to the point of giving up 100 yard pass and run.
      For the umpteenth time, the Esks despite popular misconeption did not have an all out blitz on that play, if they did they may have avoided the grisly fate. They started to have an all out blitz but then their backers backed out into a short zone (how dumb is that) and they had 5 men rush the QB. The sin on that play was not getting theri DBs deep enough not in the fact that they blitzed.

      If you look at the majority of the last play miracles in any league of football they come about because the team only rushed 3 and let the QB dance around back there. (Flutie for Boston college, Kordell Stewart for Colorado)

      Comment


        #33
        Re: Jim Barker

        Originally posted by Beerfish View Post
        For the umpteenth time, the Esks despite popular misconeption did not have an all out blitz on that play, if they did they may have avoided the grisly fate. They started to have an all out blitz but then their backers backed out into a short zone (how dumb is that) and they had 5 men rush the QB. The sin on that play was not getting theri DBs deep enough not in the fact that they blitzed.

        If you look at the majority of the last play miracles in any league of football they come about because the team only rushed 3 and let the QB dance around back there. (Flutie for Boston college, Kordell Stewart for Colorado)
        I HATE the 3 man rush! It provides no pressure, the QB has all day to look around and any competent QB can find a receiver because the field is still too big for 9 men to cover.

        If I were the coach I'd shoot any DC that employs the 3 man rush.

        RC is an idiot to even have a 2 man rush!

        It should never be used except when you are more than 2 TD's ahead with 1 minute left.
        If we were put on this earth to help others, what were the others put on earth for?

        Comment


          #34
          Re: Jim Barker

          Originally posted by Oiler View Post
          I HATE the 3 man rush! It provides no pressure, the QB has all day to look around and any competent QB can find a receiver because the field is still too big for 9 men to cover.

          If I were the coach I'd shoot any DC that employs the 3 man rush.

          RC is an idiot to even have a 2 man rush!

          It should never be used except when you are more than 2 TD's ahead with 1 minute left.
          I think every team institutes a 3 man rush at some point during every game. Since TO has had success with that I notice it from every team at some point. Not saying I like it but it goes to show the defensive mentality of bend-but-don't-break.
          Quote from Inquiring Mind:

          Of course stamphater is sacred... we all worship the ground he walks on.

          #PizStrong

          Comment


            #35
            Re: Jim Barker

            Originally posted by Sgt. Nuke View Post
            So you're saying that your defence wouldn't have blitzed 9 guys on 3rd and 10 with the game on the line? OK. You're hired.

            Which reminds me....why can SK blitz and rattle Burris to the point of throwing away the ball...while our D blitzes to the point of giving up 100 yard pass and run.
            Originally posted by stamphater View Post
            I think every team institutes a 3 man rush at some point during every game. Since TO has had success with that I notice it from every team at some point. Not saying I like it but it goes to show the defensive mentality of bend-but-don't-break.

            The answer is not just about play calling, and for that matter calling the right plays at the right times... it's also a matter of better players. And if you don't have better players, then you have to use the guys you have in the most effective way possible.
            Turf Toe:
            - "...turf toe is a common malady that is more of a nuisance than a serious injury."
            - "Turf toe can often progress into a chronic problem..."
            - "A mild instance of turf toe (grade 1) can be merely aggravating while a serious case (grade 3) can be debilitating."

            Comment

            Working...
            X