Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

User Profile

Collapse

Profile Sidebar

Collapse
Sectionq
Sectionq
Legendary Bear hater
Last Activity: 07-31-2026, 02:33 PM
Joined: 03-04-2005
Location:
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
  • Source
Clear All
new posts

  • Sectionq
    replied to Attendance (cc: SectionQ)
    I see they opened part of section U2. T2, S2 from rows 46 to 64.

    - What I feel they should is open the top 8-10 rows max of the upper bowl between the goal lines on each side of the stadium. Then I would tarp off the rest of the upper bowls...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied to 2026 season
    Yourself and a few others who respond to me about attendance and fans, most of you if not all of you guys already go to games and have been going even when it was pretty dark times. So huge props for guys like yourself who stuck it out.

    ...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied to 2026 season
    This upcoming game in my opinion is a must win game when it comes to a true reset with the fans. I am sure the Riders will be hungry, they are a good team but Edmonton can't be calling out fans to come and not win. They can't have alum writing things,...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied to 2026 season
    Grant for sure isn't getting replaced by him.

    Maybe Orange if he starts playing poorly but I am betting they give him lots of rope because of his experience. So Mathis might be in tough which is too bad because didn't they give up a first...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied to 2026 season
    The issue with Mathis is who's he replacing if you want to get him more playing time?

    Mack and Luther who are American are not coming out. They are already dressing 2 Canadians at receiver....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied to EE vs Sask, July 23rd, 2026
    People can say what they want. It's a 9 team league, you have to play who you got....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied to EE vs Sask, July 23rd, 2026
    Holy crap, I think Edmonton might be for real!!

    The last few games teams have been big time keying on Rankin thinking Edmonton is a 1 trick pony but Cody is showing they are clearly not. I am actually starting to go into games thinking...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied to EE vs Lions at home July 17, 2026
    Full disclosure, I don't own a dog. My oldest is quite allergic to dogs and cats. I know there is some breeds you can get to help with that but with our lifestyle, we don't want a pet. So for those that are dog people. Great. But WHY do they allow people...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied to Attendance (cc: SectionQ)
    You are 100% right, there is no guarantee that changing the name will get everyone who left to come back but we both agree it would get back some. What that number is, who knows. When I brought up Sask and Winnipeg, I brought them up not to compare them...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by Sectionq; 07-15-2026, 12:51 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied to Attendance (cc: SectionQ)
    I have no idea how long it would take to re-cover 2 mill but my guess is not that long. The Bombers supposedly turned a 12.9 mill profit for 2025. That's probably a one off for being that high but Sask and the Bombers are the only teams consistently...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by Sectionq; 07-14-2026, 05:01 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied to Attendance (cc: SectionQ)
    When we had our seats in 2018, our last year, I thought the season ticket base was in the high teens at least. I could be wrong on that number but I can remember being in the seats even on a Thursday with mediocre weather and the announced attendance...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied to Attendance (cc: SectionQ)
    I'd like to know what the number to change back would be because I kind of question that a little. The reason I question it is, according to him changing the name was extremely unpopular, is still extremely unpopular and is a reason a lot of fans refuse...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied to Attendance (cc: SectionQ)
    I couldn't agree more.

    There is no way to truly know but IMO, if the team was still called the Eskimos but all the crap and losing that has happened over the years was still the same, the crowds during that time and now wouldn't have been...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied to Attendance (cc: SectionQ)
    Brinkman is from Iowa City. If you see them again, ask them what their fav NFL team is. I googled it and the closest NFL team is the Bears so I am assuming that would be the team they probably cheer for. The Bears in Chicago started in 1922. Ask them...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by Sectionq; 07-14-2026, 09:25 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied to Attendance (cc: SectionQ)
    That's awesome and I mean that. I am glad the fans and the players are kind of acknowledging this name is a mistake but it's not the team name right now so it doesn't mean as much as it should.

    Out of curiosity, what how did they change...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied to Attendance (cc: SectionQ)
    Sadly, and this isn't meant to diminish Looner's opinion, changing the name really hit people personally. The majority of true fans can take losing. As much as we all wish your team is awesome every year, losing is going to happen. Now maybe not to the...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied to Attendance (cc: SectionQ)
    I am not trying to diminish anyone that had tickets way up high for a long time but closing the upper deck was something that had to happen. It had to happen economically because they would be paying ushers to have to man upper sections with maybe a...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied to Attendance (cc: SectionQ)
    1000% I agree and I bet if he did, they would see a surge of fans instantly. The name shouldn't stop people but IMO it does and it stops a lot....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied to Attendance (cc: SectionQ)
    I guess we will differ on the name change but I do think the name change is more of a thing than you make it out to be and IMO if the president says it was a crippling blow, I find it hard to dismiss that because, and this is not a shot at you at all,...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Sectionq
    replied to Attendance (cc: SectionQ)
    I feel for Morris because I do think the previous Board Members and Pres's really burned a lot of bridges with many in the fan base. One of them is the name. I know there are some who say people need to get over the name and it shouldn't matter and there...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:

No activity results to display
Show More
Working...
X