Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eskimo Roster Review: Defensive Backs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Eskimo Roster Review: Defensive Backs

    Interesting reading again from Gizzie Willie:

    Eskimo Roster Review: Defensive Backs

    The Eskimos currently have 11 defensive backs on their roster. One lonely non-import to go along with ten imports. Can you imagine the chaos of this update if they hadn’t released Kelly Malveaux, Lamar Herron, and Bradley Robinson! Despite the depth, this was a position of constant angst among fans last year, as the defensive backs were torched on more than one occasion. This unit must be better in 2010 if the Eskimos want to have a serious shot at playing in the Grey Cup on their own turf this season. And yes, that will be field turf.

    What the coaches might be looking for.

    Speed, ball hawks, play makers. It’s that simple. The Eskimos had to wait until week 9 before they recorded an interception. In a pass happy league such as the CFL, this is simply unacceptable. Bobby Keyes finally made the big play on August 29th and pocketed over $1,000 in the players interception pool. A cool story for the media, but I’m sure the coaches were less than impressed. The Eskimos have added five defensive backs since the end of the 2009, so competition for roster spots will be fierce. The guys that can show they can make plays will be the ones who get to cash the cheques this year and have a shot at a hopefully much smaller interception pool.

    Current Roster.

    Willie Amos. Amos is another player that spent the entire 2009 season on the injured reserve list. An injured shoulder set him back, which for a defensive back is a good thing because presumably his speed should not have been affected. Amos has one year of playing experience with the Winnipeg Blue Bombers where he recorded decent stats for a first year player.

    Randee Drew. After an outstanding rookie year in 2007 with Montreal, Drew has struggled to be anything more than a back-up in the CFL. The Eskimos actually picked him up off the Montreal practice squad so expectations are not high for Drew to become a starter.

    Lawrence Gordan. Gordan was signed in the off-season from Hamilton, and at first it appears to be a curious addition to the Green & Gold. He’s not a ball hawk, exhibit one being the zero interceptions he has recorded in the past two seasons. So how might he fit in as an Eskimo?

    Jason Goss. If there is one defensive back that will make the roster, Goss is the one who has a position that is his to lose. A veteran that has proven to be a model of consistency, Goss has been a reliable defender that can cover opposition receivers week in and week out. Although his stats from 2009 were not remarkable, there is something to be said for being dependable. Expect solid coverage skills to be back on display from Goss in 2010.

    T.J. Hill. After being picked up when he was released by Montreal after training camp last year, Hill improved steadily as he learnt the defensive scheme being used by the Green & Gold. He finished the season strong, with an especially strong performance against Saskatchewan where he had two sacks and two interceptions.

    Anthony Malbrough. Malbrough was brought in late in the season to fill in for injuries. He is a steady veteran that knows the league. The problem with being that type of player for the Eskimos is that they really don’t have room for him to start the season.

    Sammy Okpro. Okpro is basically getting one more shot to make the Green & Gold before he will probably have to move on another organization. The only non-import on the roster at defensive back, Okpro was among the final cuts last year at the end of training camp.

    Chris Thompson. In 2008, Thompson had nine interceptions. Oh yeah, that was after he was traded from Edmonton to Hamilton. He didn’t have the same success in 2009, which allowed the Green & Gold to re-acquire him in exchange for Maurice Mann.

    Lenny Walls. The Eskimos needed to add players that could make the big play and pull in the interception. Walls, like Thompson, has proven that he can step in front of an errant throw and make the play for his team. And like Thompson, he is a new addition to the Eskimos after being signed from Winnipeg in the off-season.

    Gemera Williams. Another late season addition to the Green & Gold, Williams saw limited action after spending his first couple of games on the practice squad. In college, Williams set a school record for knockdowns at the University of Buffalo. Knockdowns. Not interceptions. What does that mean? It means that he can defend a pass, but is not the type of player that can force turnovers.

    Lenny Williams. Entering his third season with the Eskimos, Lenny Williams has been improving every year. Once again, a defensive back that is solid, but hasn’t quite turned the corner in terms of being a big playmaker. Williams is a leader and should be able to maintain his roster spot although he might not be a starter for the entire season if others show they are more capable of making the big plays that turn an average defence into a great defence.

    Changes???

    In a word…YES! Going nine plus games without an interception, not to mention getting burnt deep on more than one occasion demands that changes be made. To their credit, the Eskimos have been proactive in getting better in the defensive backfield. The additions of Thompson and Walls certainly are a step in the right direction. If the Eskimos have the opportunity to add a talented Canadian to the mix like Taureen Allen in the CFL Draft, it would be a further move to solidifying what could be a potent defence.

    Link:
    http://eskimosnation.wordpress.com/2...fensive-backs/

    #2
    Re: Eskimo Roster Review: Defensive Backs

    Well, Lenny Williams and Malbrough are already gone. The biggest change this season, I hope, is stability. With Hall running the defense this year, I'm hoping for a much more solid year-long performance.
    Out of my mind; back in five minutes.

    Comment


      #3
      Re: Eskimo Roster Review: Defensive Backs

      Goss/Drew/Thompson/Walls are a very good bunch. Amos is no slouch and Gordon had potential.

      There is absolutely nothing wrong with the talent level here, it's all about getting everyone to work in the scheme and get communication and chemistry down. I'm hoping that we keep Goss and Drew on the short side working together because they did well together at the end of the last year. Although, Goss would make as great safety and I think Walls would be a great fit at short side corner. If we can make the ratio work, here's what I would love to see:

      Walls/Drew/Goss/Thompson/Amos

      that is just deadly.

      Comment


        #4
        Re: Eskimo Roster Review: Defensive Backs

        Originally posted by Numberz View Post
        Goss/Drew/Thompson/Walls are a very good bunch. Amos is no slouch and Gordon had potential.

        There is absolutely nothing wrong with the talent level here, it's all about getting everyone to work in the scheme and get communication and chemistry down. I'm hoping that we keep Goss and Drew on the short side working together because they did well together at the end of the last year. Although, Goss would make as great safety and I think Walls would be a great fit at short side corner. If we can make the ratio work, here's what I would love to see:

        Walls/Drew/Goss/Thompson/Amos

        that is just deadly.
        In 08' when we acquired Younger, IIRC did Goss not play safety to start off the season. I know he definitely did in a few games,but the season opener against SASK for sure.
        He definitely looked out of place playing safety which is why it didn't long for the coaches to move him back to half.
        Tucker = Clutch

        Comment


          #5
          Re: Eskimo Roster Review: Defensive Backs

          Originally posted by Tucker83 View Post
          In 08' when we acquired Younger, IIRC did Goss not play safety to start off the season. I know he definitely did in a few games,but the season opener against SASK for sure.
          He definitely looked out of place playing safety which is why it didn't long for the coaches to move him back to half.
          Different system. Goss is a range guy and a ball hawk, not someone who will step into the box and make tackles or fight off blocks. I think Hall's system Goss is a better fit at safety. It would still be an adjustment, but I think he would be capable of it.

          ...but on the other hand, Goss has developed quite nicely into the short side corner position, and something tells me...why mess with a good thing?

          Comment


            #6
            Re: Eskimo Roster Review: Defensive Backs

            Don't agree with his analysis of drew at all..

            Guy was pretty good down that back stretch last year, and I expect more of the same in 2010 from him..

            I'm pretty happy with our DBS right now, I am guessing g.Williams may not make the end of camp
            but then again, I'm not sold on Amos either...

            Comment


              #7
              Re: Eskimo Roster Review: Defensive Backs

              The focus on the secondary is to have guys who can physically challenge receivers not just cover them. We need to be able to grind down the inside slots and take away those options as the game wears on.

              Goss will be pushed this year at camp as teams saw and exploited weaknesses in certain parts of his game. I don't think that he is in danger of not being an Eskimo for 2010 but they do want to see more in terms of physicality out of the half positions and they need a shutdown boundary corner. Too soon to be writing guys into spots as camp will be hotly contested
              I will not, for a moment longer, support an organization who chooses to cowardly kneel where they once fiercely & proudly stood

              Comment


                #8
                Re: Eskimo Roster Review: Defensive Backs

                Originally posted by Diesel View Post
                The focus on the secondary is to have guys who can physically challenge receivers not just cover them. We need to be able to grind down the inside slots and take away those options as the game wears on.

                Goss will be pushed this year at camp as teams saw and exploited weaknesses in certain parts of his game. I don't think that he is in danger of not being an Eskimo for 2010 but they do want to see more in terms of physicality out of the half positions and they need a shutdown boundary corner. Too soon to be writing guys into spots as camp will be hotly contested
                This confuses me because it's really not what Richie's system was in Saskatchewan...at all. He was all about getting pressure and letting the DBs play conservatively and then jump on poorly thrown passes.

                Is the need for physical DBs a way of making up for our lack of a pass rush? It's as if we're admitting that we can't get the job done up there. Or maybe it's just a simple change in philosophy because it's working for Calgary...?

                ...and even with this system, if we have physical DBs challenging receivers, then we'll probably need a safety you sits back and can cover a lot of ground....no? Although it was really Milton Collins that brought the Stamps secondary together, and I thought he was a physical, big hitter type.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Re: Eskimo Roster Review: Defensive Backs

                  I don't see us running a carbon copy of the Sask defence but I do expect some similarities. Having players who can do more than fit the system in terms of ability is a bonus especially when you desin wrinkles into the scheme as the season wears on.
                  I will not, for a moment longer, support an organization who chooses to cowardly kneel where they once fiercely & proudly stood

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Re: Eskimo Roster Review: Defensive Backs

                    Originally posted by Diesel View Post
                    I don't see us running a carbon copy of the Sask defence but I do expect some similarities. Having players who can do more than fit the system in terms of ability is a bonus especially when you desin wrinkles into the scheme as the season wears on.
                    When you have players that can play either half or corner, it should also open up a lot of possibilities in terms of disguising coverages and where guys will line up from play to play.
                    Before you insult a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, when you insult him, you'll be a mile away, and have his shoes.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Re: Eskimo Roster Review: Defensive Backs

                      And being able to switch from a double cloud type scheme to press coverage and being effective in both is also a huge plus. The key is finding guys with that type of versitility
                      I will not, for a moment longer, support an organization who chooses to cowardly kneel where they once fiercely & proudly stood

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Re: Eskimo Roster Review: Defensive Backs

                        Originally posted by Numberz View Post

                        Is the need for physical DBs a way of making up for our lack of a pass rush? It's as if we're admitting that we can't get the job done up there. Or maybe it's just a simple change in philosophy because it's working for Calgary...?

                        ...and even with this system, if we have physical DBs challenging receivers, then we'll probably need a safety you sits back and can cover a lot of ground....no? Although it was really Milton Collins that brought the Stamps secondary together, and I thought he was a physical, big hitter type.
                        The Stamps secondary has been successful being physical right off the line of scrimmage. It hasn't mattered whether it was Collins, Lysack, or whoever else they've had back there the last few years.

                        Before them though, the Eskimos used to be very tough in their secondary. Donnie Brady was likely the poster child for that style of play from the halfback position. A shift back to a bit more grit would be a welcome return IMO.
                        Before you insult a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, when you insult him, you'll be a mile away, and have his shoes.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X