Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Report Card

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Report Card

    Report card
    Jonathan Huntington's hits and misses from the 2005 season ...

    By JONATHAN HUNTINGTON, EDMONTON SUN




    THE DEFENSIVE LINE: A

    Second in the league in QB sacks even though some positions

    looked like a revolving door in the second half of the year.

    - - -

    LB A.J. GASS: A



    The defence led the league in 13 of 25 categories, including fewest rushing yards. Gass is the captain of the ship.

    - - -

    LB SINGOR MOBLEY: A

    Led the team in tackles.

    - - -

    [U]LB STEVEN MARSH[/U] : A

    Tailor-made for the CFL. Quick and strong.

    - - -

    K/P SEAN FLEMING: F (1st half) A+ (2nd half)

    A FG success rate of 57% after the opening eight games deserves a failing grade. But nobody was better down the stretch. Fleming was 21-23 on FG attempts in his final seven games.

    - - -

    CB KEYUO CRAVER: A

    CFL rookie wasn't scored against in his six games on the corner to end the season as Sanchez's replacement.

    - - -

    LS TAYLOR INGLIS: A

    The rookie looked shaky during some practice snaps, but didn't misfire once in the regular season.

    - - -

    DB DONNY BRADY: A

    CFL West all-star.

    - - -

    S KELLY WILTSHIRE: A

    Edmonton's outstanding Canadian nominee. Missed one game: the Hamilton blowout. Coincidence?

    - - -

    CB MALCOLM FRANK: C+

    Was repeatedly picked on by opposing teams in the playoffs and they had significant success on deep pass plays. Also led the secondary in tackles - not a good sign.

    - - -

    DB SHANNON GARRETT : B
    Wasn't scored against until Nik Lewis became a personal nightmare in the final game of the regular season.

    - - -

    QB RICKY RAY
    : B

    Struggled down the stretch and needed to be bailed out in the West semifinal and final. But he still set CFL/Eskimo passing records and delivered in the clutch in the Grey Cup.

    - - -

    THE OFFENSIVE LINE: B-

    Yes, Ray was battered through most of the regular season and was often seen running for his life. But every defence in the league knew it was pass, pass, pass. But once the Esks started to run the ball when Davis arrived, the O-line opened running lanes and gave up just three sacks over the

    final three regular-season games.

    - - -

    RB TROY DAVIS: A+

    Averaged nearly 100 yards per game in the final four regular-season tilts, had a 6.2-yard average in the Grey Cup and is the best pass-blocking RB in the league.

    - - -

    FB MATHIEU BERTRAND: A

    Yet to find a player that won't sing Bertrand's praises."I respect him like no other on the team," said backup WR Rob Leblanc. "He is an unbelievable warrior."

    - - -

    WR TREVOR GAYLOR: B-

    Talented when concentrating, but dropped too many catchable balls in the playoffs. The Esks are fortunate those drops didn't knock them out.

    - - -

    SB MOOKIE MITCHELL: A
    Incredibly reliable. Example: third-down gamble with 1:43 remaining in the Grey Cup.

    - - -

    SB JASON TUCKER
    : A+
    Who in the league is better? Tucker led the CFL in receiving.

    - - -

    WR ED HERVEY: B

    Only scored one TD in 12 games, which isn't good, but it's tough to give him a lower grade because he probably wasn't 100% for some games after the major knee injury. Gets extra marks for being a team leader.

    - - -

    COACH DANNY MACIOCIA: A

    Wins the Grey Cup in his rookie year and plays a role in bringing Troy Davis and Dan Comiskey to town.

    - - -

    HIT OF THE YEAR: TROY DAVIS

    Edmonton gave up almost nothing to get Troy Davis, an all-star running back, and Dan Comiskey, a warrior on the offensive line.

    The Esks lost three of their last four games in September. But after the trade, they won six of their final seven games - and every tilt was against a team with a .500 record or above. Four of those six wins came on the road.

    - - -

    RUNNER-UP: ROGER REINSON

    One bad snap could have cost the Esks the Grey Cup. But after signing as the emergency longsnapper for the final two playoff games Roger Reinson was rock solid.

    - - -

    MISS OF THE YEAR: DAVIS SANCHEZ

    Davis Sanchez was just trying to help, but in hindsight, he should have sat for a few weeks in October.

    After straining a groin while losing to Hamilton on Sept. 30, Sanchez had trouble with the groin in practice the next week, but tried to play on Thanksgiving Day in Toronto. He didn't survive the first half, tearing the groin. The all-star CB missed the rest of the year.

    The Green and Gold could have been stuck in a terrible spot if rookie Keyuo Craver hadn't played so well.

    - - -

    TURNING POINT: HAMILTON HORROR

    The horror show in Hamilton on Sept. 30 was the low point of the year, but the 40-14 loss to the 2-10 Tiger-Cats was also a key moment in the season.

    "It was a wake-up call in Hamilton," said receiver Ed Hervey.

    Before losing in Steeltown, Edmonton had ended the B.C. Lions' 11-game unbeaten streak with a spirited effort.

    "Losing to Hamilton (told us) that we have to be able to maintain that intensity level," continued Hervey. "That was a lesson we needed to learn and it helped us with the stretch run."

    Edmonton lost just once the remainder of the year after leaving Hamilton.

    - - -

    QUESTION MARK I: Jason Tucker

    Will the Eskimos sign the last of the Big Three?

    Hugh Campbell has already tied up Joe Montford and Troy Davis.

    But losing Tucker, who led the league in receiving, would be a huge blow.

    - - -

    QUESTION MARK II: Tony Tompkins

    Will Tony Tompkins return?

    With five touchdowns, nobody had more special-teams majors in the CFL this year than Tompkins.

    But Tompkins can flee to the NFL this winter - and with his explosive burst of speed, he might catch the eye of a few teams.

    - - -

    QUESTION MARK III: alston, jeanty

    Will Charles Alston and/or Rashad Jeanty return?

    The dynamic young duo on the defensive line combined for 11 sacks this year. However, both are entering the option year of their contract, meaning they can also leave for the NFL.

    "I'd be wrong to say I am not (thinking about the NFL)," said Alston, who had two sacks on Grey Cup Sunday, "but it's just not a No. 1 priority.

    "I like to play football and I like to win - and right now, my best opportunity to win is right here."

    - - -

    QUESTION MARK IV: Malvin Hunter

    Will Malvin Hunter return? It can be argued the special-teams unit won two huge games in the final two months.

    Tompkins' kickoff return TD in the Grey Cup took the Eskimos off the ropes. And his TD gallop against B.C on Sept. 24 changed the momentum - and the Esks never looked back.

    Hunter is enthusiastic and determined - but also has another young team thousands of miles away. He has a wife and two young children in Virginia.

    "I had a great time this year, but I have to get back home and make sure I am doing the right thing on both ends.''

    #2
    Re: Report Card

    I'd also Add : Tony Tompkins: A-

    5 return Tds, great speed. But imo, also needs to remember to hit the holes quicker and not to dance as much, great beginning

    Comment


      #3
      Re: Report Card

      Hard to imagine that this D, which led the league in 13 of 25 categories, didn't get a single all-star nod.

      Conspiracy!! Conspiracy, I tell you! The league is in the Riders' back pocket!
      Out of my mind; back in five minutes.

      Comment


        #4
        Re: Report Card

        ...and I'll add:Kwame Cavil - A+

        A wide selection of Gatorade was readily available and chilled at the proper temp., towels were always clean and helmets were well maintained and polished before gametime.



        Seriously though, I think he's bang on with most of his comments except I thought he might have been a little generous in giving the o-line a B-.
        Go Eskies!

        Comment


          #5
          Re: Report Card

          The Oline come playoff time sucked it up huge and played very very well. The first two thirds of the year looked very much like a train wreck at times.
          I will not, for a moment longer, support an organization who chooses to cowardly kneel where they once fiercely & proudly stood

          Comment


            #6
            Re: Report Card

            I thought that some of those grades were a little bit generous, especially the one for the O-line. I would give them a B- at best, especially considering that they were pretty ineffective before the Davis and Comiskey acquisitions.

            Also, I don't necessarily think that the loss in Hamilton that was the turning point; more accurately, it was the trade immediately afterwards that gave us a running game and bolstered the O-line. There were also several miniature turning points throughout the season, such as Fleming's remarkably improved play.
            "The longer that I'm married, the more I realize that the wife is right" - Angelus, July 24, 2010

            Comment


              #7
              Re: Report Card

              They brought home the Cup, A+'s all around.
              COLOR=DarkGreen]Eskimo fan in Newfoundland, Missing my season seat![/COLOR]

              Comment


                #8
                Re: Report Card

                Originally posted by Frito's Fan
                I thought that some of those grades were a little bit generous, especially the one for the O-line. I would give them a B- at best, especially considering that they were pretty ineffective before the Davis and Comiskey acquisitions.

                Also, I don't necessarily think that the loss in Hamilton that was the turning point; more accurately, it was the trade immediately afterwards that gave us a running game and bolstered the O-line. There were also several miniature turning points throughout the season, such as Fleming's remarkably improved play.
                Yes I agree with you. I am an Eskimo fan but I have to say that some of the grades were rather generous.

                For example, as much as I am a Jason Tucker fan (I sure hope he returns and I can't see where else he would go) he did have some inconsistent games where he didn't contribute that much. I would say "B+"

                Matthew Bertrand has become a very realiable and hard working fullback with good routes out of the backfield but he's no Blake Marshall just yet. I would have said a "B".

                Donny Brady is a very good DB but he does have a habit of holding guys and for that reason I wouldn't give him an "A"

                Oh, those homers, they do have a way of making you warm and fuzzy all over .

                As for the NFL option guys? I expect all 3 to be in the Eskimo camp when it opens or be back by labour day. I've said it before, for 99.99% of the CFL guys the NFL is not a reality. This is nothing against the players, just an observation after having watched this stuff for many years.
                Last edited by moontoscott; 12-04-2005, 04:49 PM.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Re: Report Card

                  Originally posted by moontoscott
                  For example, as much as I am a Jason Tucker fan (I sure hope he returns and I can't see where else he would go) he did have some inconsistent games where he didn't contribute that much. I would say "B+"
                  B+ for the league's leading receiver?

                  Wow. Just wow.
                  "No one entertains the thought that maybe God does not believe in you." - Bo Burnham

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Re: Report Card

                    O-line C at best, only because they played really pretty well the last couple of games. In the end that's what counts but if looking at the whole year they had alot of D games. (I include the line, plus blocking schemes etc in this. Not always is it a particular guys fault when the QB gets rocked but when he's getting pasted on every play it still is on the O-line.)

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Re: Report Card

                      For example, as much as I am a Jason Tucker fan (I sure hope he returns and I can't see where else he would go) he did have some inconsistent games where he didn't contribute that much. I would say "B+"
                      Absolutely not!!

                      Tucker has always been clutch.

                      His route running is flawless, and his timing on catches is what seperates him from every other receiver in the league.

                      Everyone also saw how versatile he is when DM had him back returning kickoffs as well.

                      Nothing against the CFL, but JT should not be in this league!! He's just too good.

                      I'm just glad he is on the dark side. He gets an A+.
                      Long live the B.O.N.E.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Re: Report Card

                        Games where Tucker didn't contribute? Because he dropped passes? Or because he never got passes? Can't blame him for a ball that's never thrown his direction...
                        I officially retract my vote for DDS as Prime Minister. He's clearly incompetent.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Re: Report Card

                          Originally posted by Sgt. Nuke
                          Games where Tucker didn't contribute? Because he dropped passes? Or because he never got passes? Can't blame him for a ball that's never thrown his direction...
                          Yeh for sure-wow just wow man--Tucker slumped in the middle of the season, especially around the time of the Hamilton fiasco. Also, recall that after the last regular season game in Calgary (wow it seems a long time ago) that DM was openly critical of one that Tucker dropped on a key drive. This came from the head coach, not me.

                          As a matter of fact there were a few people here on the website (not myself) who suggested that this was why he was no longer with the Cowboys. You can't say, as someone above has that Tucker is too good for the CFL. He has made an attempt a few years ago to check out his NFL options again but as I recall he had no serious offers. He even considered signing with Saskatchewan

                          B+ is still an excellent mark-even in today's environment of inflated grades. "F" or "D" aren't so good but we can reserve those for Nik Lewis or somebody like that d. By the way, yes Tucker is an excellent receiver but is he the best in the league? I think that Ben Cahoon and Geroy Simon (and don't forget Mookie Mitchell) might have something to say about that. In terms of consistency and never having a bad game I would give Mookie Mitchell an "A" for his performance this season. His 3rd down catch in the Grey Cup proved that and don't forget his 3rd and long catch against Winnipeg early in the season. No one is more clutch than Mookie.

                          There are also some pretty good guys in Toronto as well. Tucker is top 5 for sure but it is always tough to rank the top five. Not to worry, he will be back with the Eskimos-no one will outbid the Esks in the CFL.
                          Last edited by moontoscott; 12-04-2005, 11:00 PM.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Re: Report Card

                            Totally agree with Mookie's "A" ... glad to see I'm not the only one who recognized his value.

                            As for the speculation regarding players resigning (Tucker, etc.) or going to the NFL (Alston, Tompkins, etc.) ...
                            - on one hand keeping players on board is much easier if you've just come off a championship winning season (case in point last season's Argos)
                            - on the other hand not making any changes can be detrimental (case in point last season's Argos)
                            What does it boil down to? The players we really want to have around are likely going to stick around. And that leaves the focus on plugging holes and increasing depth.
                            Turf Toe:
                            - "...turf toe is a common malady that is more of a nuisance than a serious injury."
                            - "Turf toe can often progress into a chronic problem..."
                            - "A mild instance of turf toe (grade 1) can be merely aggravating while a serious case (grade 3) can be debilitating."

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Re: Report Card

                              Yeh for sure-wow just wow man--Tucker slumped in the middle of the season, especially around the time of the Hamilton fiasco. Also, recall that after the last regular season game in Calgary (wow it seems a long time ago) that DM was openly critical of one that Tucker dropped on a key drive. This came from the head coach, not me

                              I dont think Tucker was in a slump... He was most likely getting double and triple covered, not to mention he didn't have a lot of balls thrown at him later on in the season... granted he did drop a few passes that he shouldn't have - but i still dont see him being in a slump

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X