Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Proposed Rule Changes to be Voted Upon

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Proposed Rule Changes to be Voted Upon

    from cfl.ca - here's what they're officially proposing...

    http://cfl.ca/article/cfl-eyeing-cha...er-field-goals

    CFL EYEING CHANGES TO SAFETIES, FORMATIONS, REPLAY CHALLENGES AND KICK OFFS AFTER FIELD GOALS
    Board of Governors to consider moves suggested by fans and rules committee

    Hamilton, Ontario (March 5, 2009) -- The Canadian Football League is eyeing a few new moves.

    Its Board of Governors is considering:

    •Moving back the kick-off following a safety touch, to reduce the number of times a team chooses to take a knee in its own end zone;

    •Giving coaches the green light to use so called "wildcat" formations that would move the quarterback around, instead of requiring him to stand behind or under centre;

    •Requiring a team that kicks a successful field goal to then kick off to its' opponents, increasing the number of kick returns;

    •Awarding a team a third challenge of an official's ruling using instant replay if its' first two challenges are successfull.

    All four ideas were approved today by the league's rules committee, and were among those suggested by CFL fans.

    "We tend to look at our game like a precious stone that has been in the family for generations: we're willing to put a new shine on it, but we strive to be very careful not to damage it," said Tom Higgins, the CFL's director of officiating and a member of the rules committee. "We feel the rule changes we've discussed today can improve an already great product, and now the final say rests with our board."

    This year, for the first time, CFL fans were invited by the league to submit their ideas for rules changes. More than 2,000 submissions were received, most of them detailed and all of them passionate about the game and how it's played.

    Several fans wanted some sort of change made to the safety touch, citing coaches' tendency to surrender two points in their own end zone to preserve field position, instead of punting the ball away to their opponents, which could sent up a kick return or offensive drive with a high chance of scoring.

    The committee is suggesting moving the kickoff following a safety back, from the 35 yard line to the 25 yard line, which could encourage more coaches to kick the ball away rather than take a knee in the end zone.

    Other fans called for the introduction of the so-called "wildcat formation," which would require a change to the current CFL rule that requires the quarterback to always line up under or behind the centre of the offensive line.

    The committee wants to allow the quarterback to move to other spots in a formation, including at wide receiver, before the ball is snapped.

    Fans generally wanted to see more kick returns, citing a return that goes for a touchdown as one of the most exciting plays in Canadian football.

    The commitee is suggesting requiring a kick off after every made field goal, instead of giving the receiving the team the option of scrimmaging from their 35-yard-line.

    It is also proposing awarding a team with a third challenge of an official's call using replay if its' first two challenges are successful.

    ''Other topics brought forward by our fans, or by committee members, ranged from the rouge to the convert to allowing more types of plays to be challenged on the basis of instant replay," Higgins said.

    "But at the end of the day, there wasn't a clear consensus, among our fans or committee members, on exactly what should be done to improve those rules, so they've been tabled for future discussion."

    The Board of Governors has the power to accept, reject or even alter the rules committee's suggestions. It will meet later this Spring, in plenty of time to institute rule changes in time for the Canada Day kickoff of the Canadian Football League's regular schedule.

    "I want to thank the fans that took the time to send us their ideas to improve our game," said CFL Commissionner, Mark Cohon.

    "While there wasn't always unanimity on exactly what should be done, there was lots of spirited debate on our fan forums and in the media, and virtually everyone agreed our process was stronger for our fans' input and insight, and it's something we hope to continue," he said.

    "Over the years, many significant rules changes have been discussed by the committee or our board more than once before they have moved forward. So it's likely that in addition to the changes brought forward today, others submitted by fans will be considered in the years ahead."
    Hope, at the end of the day connects us all, no matter how different we are

    #2
    Re: Proposed Rule Changes to be Voted Upon

    Like

    Like

    Hate

    Uncertain

    Comment


      #3
      Re: Proposed Rule Changes to be Voted Upon

      I like it. I'm not a big fan of teams just taking it at their 35 every time the other team scores. On a field goal, the offense didn't get as much so they shouldn't give up as much field position (in general).

      Allowing the QB to line-up anywhere and the safety touch change are two changes that are a long time coming.

      Third review: same as Muley. Seems like the CFL just copying the NFL. Reviews really slow down the game a lot. Isn't there already some kind of 'freebie' in addition to the one we get for each half?

      Comment


        #4
        Re: Proposed Rule Changes to be Voted Upon

        I like all four. The safety is obvious, and moving the QB around sounds like the kind of fun the CFL is known for. Getting rid of the 35-yard line possession after a FG is great. Until now, a receiving team has the right to take away a potential return...? I never understood the logic in that. It took some of the fun out of the game. Besides, DM did it all the time so it must be wrong.

        On the reviews, doesn't it seem reasonable that if a team has successfully avoided being ****ed twice by the refs, that they should retain the right to challenge being ****ed again? I think it happened to BC once last season.

        If successful reviews slow the game down, then you fix it by getting better refs. Like my 85-year-old blind great uncle.
        Out of my mind; back in five minutes.

        Comment


          #5
          Re: Proposed Rule Changes to be Voted Upon

          I think all the proposals would be nice tweaks without unsettling our game too much. I think the return game is exciting and I'm all for more. If the "wildcat" formation is approved, it'll be interesting to see which team runs the formation first. If I had to pick one, moving back the kickoff after a safety is the best choice.
          Hope, at the end of the day connects us all, no matter how different we are

          Comment


            #6
            Re: Proposed Rule Changes to be Voted Upon

            Originally posted by Numberz View Post
            Third review: same as Muley. Seems like the CFL just copying the NFL. Reviews really slow down the game a lot. Isn't there already some kind of 'freebie' in addition to the one we get for each half?
            Currently it's two reviews and they are upping it to three. I believe that if a team needs to review three plays in the same game that there is a reffing crew that needs to be replaced.

            However the big issue is the time that is currently wasted. I would like to see the instant replay reviews taken off the field by putting two league officials upstairs with all the angles available to them. In the NCAA conferences that use this system their times have been cut in half compared to NFL/CFL reviews.

            Comment


              #7
              Re: Proposed Rule Changes to be Voted Upon

              On windy days in Winnipeg and Regina, the team facing the wind will be pinned down under their goal posts the entire quarter as for every score by the other team, they will be receiving the kick-off end their end zone and trying to run it out. Safeties will result in a similar punishment.

              In those games, the outcome will be determined by the coin toss and not by the players. Many will be over by half-time.

              "I want to thank the fans that took the time to send us their ideas to improve our game," said CFL Commissionner, Mark Cohon. We can likely thank the Rider fans for the kick-off changes.

              Home field advantage just got better on the Prairies .......

              Comment


                #8
                Re: Proposed Rule Changes to be Voted Upon

                Originally posted by Hugoagogo View Post
                If the "wildcat" formation is approved, it'll be interesting to see which team runs the formation first.
                I would like to see Edmonton use it with Bertrand but would suspect that either Toronto would use it with Reggie McNeal or Calgary with Reynolds/Cornish/Copeland.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Re: Proposed Rule Changes to be Voted Upon

                  Originally posted by Rids View Post
                  I would like to see Edmonton use it with Bertrand but would suspect that either Toronto would use it with Reggie McNeal or Calgary with Reynolds/Cornish/Copeland.
                  Yeah, I'd bet Calgary...
                  Someone should let our new coach know that Bertrand was a QB in college - Danny obviously didn't know...
                  Hope, at the end of the day connects us all, no matter how different we are

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Re: Proposed Rule Changes to be Voted Upon

                    The Safety Dance will hopefully come to an end. Seems like a no-brainer. I've always understood that it was part of the strategy, but it goes hand-in-hand with the rule change that requires the ball to bounce out of bounds between the twenties.

                    As for the review, I'm fine with it. But wasn't there discussion about having an NHL-style review, with the league office in Toronto taking care of it?

                    I'm all for more kick-offs, but I'm not overly thrilled about the after-field-goal rule. And allowing the quarterback to line up in a different position would be interesting.

                    My guess on the first QB to catch a TD pass is Kerry Joseph.
                    Get well soon, JT.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Re: Proposed Rule Changes to be Voted Upon

                      Originally posted by 3rd String View Post
                      The Safety Dance will hopefully come to an end. Seems like a no-brainer. I\.
                      what you got against Men Without Hats ?

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Re: Proposed Rule Changes to be Voted Upon

                        A 3rd time out is dumb. Coaches and refs don't even know what they are doing half the time with the 2 they do have. Waste of time IMO.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Re: Proposed Rule Changes to be Voted Upon

                          Honestly these are more "sane" than I thought they'd be...

                          I am curious to see some of the outrageous rules put forward by some fans , I'd bet that would be an entertaining read

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Re: Proposed Rule Changes to be Voted Upon

                            Originally posted by glenvb View Post
                            I like all four. The safety is obvious, and moving the QB around sounds like the kind of fun the CFL is known for. Getting rid of the 35-yard line possession after a FG is great. Until now, a receiving team has the right to take away a potential return...?


                            The issue I have with this rule is time.

                            Mark my words, if this rule passes, the Esks will have a FG scored against us and we'll have to accept the kick-off.

                            That takes more time off the clock than simply taking it from the 35.

                            We'll get to within one play of winning the game...the same play that would have been granted to us if we could have taken it at the 35 rather than wasting time on a kick-off.




                            As for the wild cat formation, it's a good IDEA but honestly, I never see it being employed.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Re: Proposed Rule Changes to be Voted Upon

                              the wildcat thing actually really pisses me off. I feel like it was suggested by the kind of fans who would suggest taking out the rouge, putting uprights at the back of the endzone, making the field smaller, having 11 players and 4 downs. It has showed a bunch in the NFL over the past year and now everyone wants us to be just like them

                              changes to safety is fine, skeptical about the kickoff change and replays, meh.
                              "Because this Eskimo experience is not made for just anyone" - KP

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X